Connect with us

Local News That Matters

Cities Most At Risk During Nuclear War, One In Kentucky

Published

on

Many people fear the unsettling possibility of nuclear conflict. Growing hostilities between nuclear-armed countries like the US and Russia highlight the threat’s persistence despite expectations that it will be avoided. Which US cities would most likely be targeted in such a dire situation, and are there any unanticipated dangers hiding in locations like Kentucky?

The Six Primary Targets

Six major US cities are identified as prime targets by Columbia University disaster preparedness specialist Irwin Redlener: New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, DC. These cities are appealing to enemies looking to cause as much havoc and destruction as possible because they have important infrastructure, such as financial centers, governmental buildings, and energy plants.

Other Potential Targets

A widely disseminated map derived from many data sources indicates that in addition to these main targets, other regions might also be under attack. States with intercontinental ballistic missile silos and military installations, such as Montana, North Dakota, Colorado, and Wyoming, may be considered strategic objectives. States with operational nuclear facilities, including Tennessee, Alabama, Arizona, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, may also be at risk.

The Unexpected Kentucky City

Lexington, Kentucky, turns out to be a surprising prospective target. Though Lexington is the second-biggest city in the state and is well-known for sites like the Kentucky Horse Park and the University of Kentucky, it also has a darker side. It is home to the Blue Grass Army Depot, a facility that holds conventional and chemical weapons, including nerve agents, mustard gas, and sarin. Despite ongoing efforts, it is not anticipated that these weapons will be completely destroyed until 2023, making Lexington susceptible to a secondary chemical disaster in the event of a nuclear battle.

The Conclusion

Even if the precise results of a nuclear war are unknown, some regions are thought to be more susceptible due to believable scenarios and information at hand. The risk range is broad, ranging from large urban centers to remote areas with nuclear assets. Disarmament, collaboration, and diplomacy continue to be the finest lines of defense against a nuclear meltdown. But in order to ensure that people know which locations to avoid or evacuate in the case of such a tragedy, preparation and awareness are essential.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending